oppn parties What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

News Snippets

  • 76-year-old retired doctor dies in Hyderabad after being held to digital 'arrest'
  • Paksitan admits that India had rejected thrid-party role in ending the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack
  • Supreme Court seeks reply from the states about anti-conversion laws
  • Calcutta HC rules that a man cannot deny maintaenance to his wife just because she is earning
  • Stocks rebound on Tuesday: Sensex gains 594 points to 82380 and Nifty gains 169 points to 25239
  • China Masters badminton: PV Sindhu reaches second round but Ayush Shetty knocked out
  • World Wrestling Championships: Male wresters draw a blank and wone continue to struggle, showing that India is losing out in a sport where it once excelled
  • Speed Skating World Championships: Anandkumar Velkumar becomes the first Indian to win gold in 100m inline sprint. This comes after his bronze in the 500m event
  • BCCI ropes in Apollo Tyres as new jersey sponsor after Dream 11 had to bow out due to the ban on online gaming companies, to get Rs 200cr more
  • World Athletics: High jumper Sarvesh Anil Kushare finishes an impressive sixth
  • A study has found that the Red Fort in Delhi is turning black due to air pollution
  • PM Modi asks defence ministry to achieve greater integration among armed forces
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay the entire Waqf Act but stays some provisions it finds bad in law
  • Supreme Court closes Vantara zoo case in Jamnagar after the SIT clears the body tasked with maintaining it. Says it will entertain no further complaints in the matter
  • Supreme Court says bringing political parties under POSH Act will liekly become a tool for blackmail
Sebi dismisses Hindenberg's claim against Adani group companies ////// Neeraj Chopra finishes 8th at World Athletics
oppn parties
What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-14 05:13:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

When Dean Elgar got a reprieve through DRS, Team India was not amused. Nor was on-field umpire Marais Erasmus, who had given the original decision. While Erasmus just uttered "looks impossible", the India players let go of their disappointment by making some colourful and disparaging comments. While K L Rahul was caught by the stump mike saying that the whole country was against 11 guys, skipper Kohli asked Supersport (the broadcasters) to find better ways to win. Other players were also caught muttering by the stump microphone. The situation was getting out of hand as the Indian players felt 'cheated' by the decision.

But once the cricketing world, including the BCCI, have accepted the DRS system and the use of technology to review on-field decisions, is it good to show dissent against such decisions and worse, impute motives? If the review showed that the ball was missing the stumps, that is it. It is wrong to suggest that someone could have tampered with technology to doctor the ball's probable trajectory, which is what "find better ways to win" can be construed to mean.

The technology is same for both teams and  the replays would have produced exactly the same result if the review was for an Indian batter. If someone believes otherwise, he should not be playing the game. It was disgusting to watch the way Kohli deliberately went to the stumps and bent down to say what he wanted so that it was properly recorded.

The match referee is going to take a hard look at the 'tantrum' displayed by the Indian team and will definitely fine captain Kohli and some of the players as per the rules. It lowers the dignity of the game if players protest in this manner against accepted norms and umpiring decisions. Disappointment and frustration should be countered by upping one's game and not by throwing tantrums.