oppn parties What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

News Snippets

  • EC slams Congress for raising doubts about Haryana results
  • Omar Abdullah says he hopes the Centre will keep its promise of restoring statehood for J&K
  • BJP gets a historic third term in Haryana by bagging 48 seats, a majority on its own, while Congress gets 37
  • National Conference-Congress alliance sweeps the polls in J&K, winning 49 out of 90 seats while the BJP bags 29
  • More than 50 senior R G Kar doctors send in 'mass resignation', Bengal government officials say it has no legal validity
  • Additional districts judge Anirban Das will hear the R G Kar rape-murder case in camera four days a week from November 4
  • Stocks break 6-day losing streak as Haryana poll results buoy the markets -Sensex gains 585 points to 81635 and Nifty 217 points to 25013
  • IOC president P T Usha denies allegations in CAG report that extension of Reliance contract had resulted in a loss of Rs 24cr to the sports body
  • 2nd T20 versus Bangladesh: India look to seal series with another commanding win today at New Delhi
  • Women's T20 World Cup: India take on Sri Lanka today in a bid to win and shore up their net run rate to keep afloat in the tournament
  • Asian TT: Ayhika Mukherjee beats two players ranked much higher than her as India beat South Korea 3-2 to move to the semis and assure a medal
  • 2nd U-19 Test: India scores 492 as Harvansh Pangalia hits a ton, Australia were 142 for three in reply
  • Opposition alleges that the BJP is including the 5 nominated MLAs in its scheme of froming the government in the state
  • Calcutta HC has ruled that courts cannot cancel bail without hearing the accused
  • Lalu Prasad and his sons Tejaswi and Tej Pratap secure bail in the cash-for-jobs scam
BJP defies odds and exit polls to win a third consecutive term in Haryana while NC-Congress sweep J&K
oppn parties
What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-14 05:13:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

When Dean Elgar got a reprieve through DRS, Team India was not amused. Nor was on-field umpire Marais Erasmus, who had given the original decision. While Erasmus just uttered "looks impossible", the India players let go of their disappointment by making some colourful and disparaging comments. While K L Rahul was caught by the stump mike saying that the whole country was against 11 guys, skipper Kohli asked Supersport (the broadcasters) to find better ways to win. Other players were also caught muttering by the stump microphone. The situation was getting out of hand as the Indian players felt 'cheated' by the decision.

But once the cricketing world, including the BCCI, have accepted the DRS system and the use of technology to review on-field decisions, is it good to show dissent against such decisions and worse, impute motives? If the review showed that the ball was missing the stumps, that is it. It is wrong to suggest that someone could have tampered with technology to doctor the ball's probable trajectory, which is what "find better ways to win" can be construed to mean.

The technology is same for both teams and  the replays would have produced exactly the same result if the review was for an Indian batter. If someone believes otherwise, he should not be playing the game. It was disgusting to watch the way Kohli deliberately went to the stumps and bent down to say what he wanted so that it was properly recorded.

The match referee is going to take a hard look at the 'tantrum' displayed by the Indian team and will definitely fine captain Kohli and some of the players as per the rules. It lowers the dignity of the game if players protest in this manner against accepted norms and umpiring decisions. Disappointment and frustration should be countered by upping one's game and not by throwing tantrums.