oppn parties What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

News Snippets

  • Rape-accused AAP MLA from Punjab, Harmeet Singh Pathanmajra, escaped after gunshots were fired when the police came to arrest him in Karnal in Haryana
  • Government has lifted the ban on producing ethanol from molasses
  • Delhi riot case: Delhi HC denies bail to Umar Kahlid, Sharjeel Imam and eight others
  • PM Modi says that the use of indecent language by the Congress against his dead mother is an insult to all women
  • Supreme Court says if the court can clear all pending bills, it might as well step into the governor's shoes while TN government asks it to set timelines for the governor
  • Indrani Mukherjea's duaghter Vidhie has claimed that her statements to the police and the CBI were 'forged and fabricated' to implicate her parents
  • BRS supremo K Chandrasekhar Rao has expelled his daughter K Kavitha from the party for anti-party activities
  • PM Modi said that the world trusts India with semiconductor future
  • FM Nirmala Sitharaman says the economy is set to become transparent once next-generation GST reforms are unleashed
  • Markets turn negative on Tuesday: Sensex sheds 207 points to 80158 and Nifty lost 45 points to close at 24580
  • After Dream 11's withdrawal (due to ban on online gaming companies), BCCI has invited bids for Team India's lead sponsor
  • Hockey - Asia Cup: India to play South Korea in the Super-4
  • PM Modi confers with Chinese Premier Xi and Russian President Putin on the sidelines of the SCO
  • US Prez Trump calls trade with India a 'one-sided disaster'
  • Supreme Court asks why minority institutions are left out of the ambit of RTE, will re-examine its 2014 ruling
Commerce minister Piyush Goyal hoepful of trade deal with the US by November
oppn parties
What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-14 05:13:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

When Dean Elgar got a reprieve through DRS, Team India was not amused. Nor was on-field umpire Marais Erasmus, who had given the original decision. While Erasmus just uttered "looks impossible", the India players let go of their disappointment by making some colourful and disparaging comments. While K L Rahul was caught by the stump mike saying that the whole country was against 11 guys, skipper Kohli asked Supersport (the broadcasters) to find better ways to win. Other players were also caught muttering by the stump microphone. The situation was getting out of hand as the Indian players felt 'cheated' by the decision.

But once the cricketing world, including the BCCI, have accepted the DRS system and the use of technology to review on-field decisions, is it good to show dissent against such decisions and worse, impute motives? If the review showed that the ball was missing the stumps, that is it. It is wrong to suggest that someone could have tampered with technology to doctor the ball's probable trajectory, which is what "find better ways to win" can be construed to mean.

The technology is same for both teams and  the replays would have produced exactly the same result if the review was for an Indian batter. If someone believes otherwise, he should not be playing the game. It was disgusting to watch the way Kohli deliberately went to the stumps and bent down to say what he wanted so that it was properly recorded.

The match referee is going to take a hard look at the 'tantrum' displayed by the Indian team and will definitely fine captain Kohli and some of the players as per the rules. It lowers the dignity of the game if players protest in this manner against accepted norms and umpiring decisions. Disappointment and frustration should be countered by upping one's game and not by throwing tantrums.