oppn parties What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

News Snippets

  • Actor Ranveer Singh gets extortion message from Bishnoi gang
  • Government changes IT intermediary rules reagrding reporting for AI generated content. Also, timeline for taking down unlawful content reduced to 3 hours from 36 hours
  • Bengal final voters' list to be published on Feb 28
  • CPI and CPM move Supreme Court for FIR against Assam CM Himanata Biswa Sarma over 'target-shooting' video
  • Government eyes ₹4650cr from the sale of 5.3% in Bhel
  • Tea Board mandates quality check for imported tea from May 1 to curb unrestricted imports and dumping by some countries
  • Stocks continue their bull run on Monday: Sensex gains 208 points and Nifty 67 points
  • Ranji Trophy: Bengal beat Andhra by an innings and 90 runs. Seminfinal lineup: Bengal versus J&K and Karnataka versus Uttarakhand
  • Asian Shooting: Aakriti wins silver and Anjum Moudgil bags bronze, India win silver in 50m Rifle 3 position
  • T20 WC: Pakistan beat USA, New Zealand beat UAE and Netherlands beat Namibia
  • Supreme Court says HC judges cannot assume roles of domain experts
  • Supreme Court issues notice to Bengal DGP on EC complaint on harassment of officers
  • Opposition to decide today whether to proceed on seeking removal of Lok Sabha Speaker for his decidiosn to advise PM Modi not to attend Lok Sabha fearing some action by women MPs
  • As directed by the Supreme Court, Enforcement Directorate forms SIT to probe money laundering by Anil Ambani
  • Supreme Court takes a hard stance over money siphoned from banks in cyber crime, directs for an SOP to be decided and blocking of suspect transfers
Opposition parties, except TMC, submit no-confidence notice against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla
oppn parties
What Were The Indian Players Trying To Prove?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-14 05:13:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

When Dean Elgar got a reprieve through DRS, Team India was not amused. Nor was on-field umpire Marais Erasmus, who had given the original decision. While Erasmus just uttered "looks impossible", the India players let go of their disappointment by making some colourful and disparaging comments. While K L Rahul was caught by the stump mike saying that the whole country was against 11 guys, skipper Kohli asked Supersport (the broadcasters) to find better ways to win. Other players were also caught muttering by the stump microphone. The situation was getting out of hand as the Indian players felt 'cheated' by the decision.

But once the cricketing world, including the BCCI, have accepted the DRS system and the use of technology to review on-field decisions, is it good to show dissent against such decisions and worse, impute motives? If the review showed that the ball was missing the stumps, that is it. It is wrong to suggest that someone could have tampered with technology to doctor the ball's probable trajectory, which is what "find better ways to win" can be construed to mean.

The technology is same for both teams and  the replays would have produced exactly the same result if the review was for an Indian batter. If someone believes otherwise, he should not be playing the game. It was disgusting to watch the way Kohli deliberately went to the stumps and bent down to say what he wanted so that it was properly recorded.

The match referee is going to take a hard look at the 'tantrum' displayed by the Indian team and will definitely fine captain Kohli and some of the players as per the rules. It lowers the dignity of the game if players protest in this manner against accepted norms and umpiring decisions. Disappointment and frustration should be countered by upping one's game and not by throwing tantrums.