oppn parties The Kochhar-Dhoot Case: Will ED Succeed In Proving Quid Pro Quo?

News Snippets

  • Maratha quota bill likely to be tabled in Maharashtra assembly today
  • Arvind Kejriwal skips ED summons for the 6th time, says the case is in court and will follow court's decision
  • PM Modi says UP has gone from 'red tape' to 'red carpet' in 7 years of 'double engine' government
  • Farm unions reject government offers, to resume Delhi march from today
  • Centre says some Aadhar cards in Bengal 'deactivated' due to technical glitz, will be activated back soon
  • Supreme Court stays LS privilege panel summons to Bengal officials over BJP MP Sukanta Majumdar injury case
  • Supreme Court junks Sandeshkhali petition, says it cannot be compared to Manipur, asks petitioner to approach Calcutta HC
  • Supreme Court gets tough on Chandigarh mayoral elections, asks for ballot papers and video footage, does not order re-election
  • Government starts withdrawing old small tax demands, up to Rs 25000 per entry till FY 2009-10 and up to Rs 10000 per entry from FY 2010-11 to FY 2014-15 with an overall ceiling of Rs 1 lakh per tax payer
  • Stocks remained positive on Monday: Sensex gained 281 points to 72708 and Nifty 81 points to 22122
  • Jasprit Bumrah likely to be rested for 4th Test while K L Rahul may be back
  • FIH Pro League hockey: India beat Spain 8-7 in shootout
  • SP leader Salim Sherwani, miffed at no Muslim candidate given RS ticket, quits party
  • Army going for big (Rs 57000cr) upgrade in combat vehicles to replace T-72 tanks
  • Mamata Banerjee says the BJP is doing nothing to resolve the Sandeshkhali dispute but instead fanning the fires to escalate it
History created in Supreme Court as Chandigarh mayoral poll ballots counted in court, judges declare AAP candidate Kuldeep Kumar winner after taking into account the votes defaced by returning officer Anil Masih
oppn parties
The Kochhar-Dhoot Case: Will ED Succeed In Proving Quid Pro Quo?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-09-08 20:03:43

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

With the details of the alleged shady transactions between the Videocon group and Deepak Kochhar, the husband of the discredited former chief of ICICI Bank Chanda Kochhar, in the public domain for a long time now, it was just a matter of time before he was arrested. That the Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him just before filing the chargesheet shows that it was waiting to tie up the loose ends (since it was a high profile case) and establish the money trail before laying its hands on him. Since it was on the job, it was unlikely that Kochhar could have tampered with or erased the transactions that were largely done through banks. In any case, the fact that money was paid was established long back; the main task of the investigating agencies is to prove the quid pro quo, without which the Kochhar's can continue to claim that they were perfectly legal business deals that had no connection to the loan that the ICICI Bank granted to Venugopal Dhoot and Videocon as lead bankers in a consortium. It seems that the ED has established the money trail that was routed through a maze of corporate entities, trusts and offshore tax havens.

The Enforcement Directorate claims that they were forced to take Kochhar into custody as he refused to cooperate. They say that both the Kochhar's and Dhoot have been evasive and are not answering specific questions to prove the quid pro quo as established by the money trail. They say that they will move against Chanda Kochhar too. Obviously, no one, not even a petty criminal admits his crime easily. Here we are talking about alleged white-collar criminals. They are hard-nosed businessmen and finance professionals and are being advised by top lawyers and financial wizards. They know that no one can be forced to testify against himself or herself. They know very well that Article 20(3) of the Indian constitution grants them immunity against self-incrimination and they will use it wisely. They will never confess and keep on claiming that the money changed hands in business deals that were perfectly above board. It is upon the investigating agencies now to prove that the amounts received by the Kochhar's were bribes for sanctioning the loan and not part of any business deal.