oppn parties The Government Must Accept The Arbitration Award And Move On

News Snippets

  • Maratha quota bill likely to be tabled in Maharashtra assembly today
  • Arvind Kejriwal skips ED summons for the 6th time, says the case is in court and will follow court's decision
  • PM Modi says UP has gone from 'red tape' to 'red carpet' in 7 years of 'double engine' government
  • Farm unions reject government offers, to resume Delhi march from today
  • Centre says some Aadhar cards in Bengal 'deactivated' due to technical glitz, will be activated back soon
  • Supreme Court stays LS privilege panel summons to Bengal officials over BJP MP Sukanta Majumdar injury case
  • Supreme Court junks Sandeshkhali petition, says it cannot be compared to Manipur, asks petitioner to approach Calcutta HC
  • Supreme Court gets tough on Chandigarh mayoral elections, asks for ballot papers and video footage, does not order re-election
  • Government starts withdrawing old small tax demands, up to Rs 25000 per entry till FY 2009-10 and up to Rs 10000 per entry from FY 2010-11 to FY 2014-15 with an overall ceiling of Rs 1 lakh per tax payer
  • Stocks remained positive on Monday: Sensex gained 281 points to 72708 and Nifty 81 points to 22122
  • Jasprit Bumrah likely to be rested for 4th Test while K L Rahul may be back
  • FIH Pro League hockey: India beat Spain 8-7 in shootout
  • SP leader Salim Sherwani, miffed at no Muslim candidate given RS ticket, quits party
  • Army going for big (Rs 57000cr) upgrade in combat vehicles to replace T-72 tanks
  • Mamata Banerjee says the BJP is doing nothing to resolve the Sandeshkhali dispute but instead fanning the fires to escalate it
History created in Supreme Court as Chandigarh mayoral poll ballots counted in court, judges declare AAP candidate Kuldeep Kumar winner after taking into account the votes defaced by returning officer Anil Masih
oppn parties
The Government Must Accept The Arbitration Award And Move On

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-02-03 07:52:04

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The NDA government is very concerned about India's image abroad and wants to attract foreign capital investment under its Make in India initiative. For this, it needs to make India an attractive investment destination where, among other things, a stable and transparent tax regime is one of the main requirements.

Hence it is surprising that the government has decided to appeal against the arbitration tribunal's award in the Vodafone case. The same has been admitted in a court in Singapore. It is also examining the Cairn arbitration award. The government has taken the stand that an arbitration award cannot go against the law as it stands and no bilateral treaty can take away the taxation rights of a jurisdiction. The government feels that it is a question of interpretation and the case for an appeal was strong.

But the question in the Vodafone case was not of the law as it stood but a law that was changed with retrospective effect to bring the transactions under the tax net. It had amounted to changing the goal posts after the start of the match and was against the norms of a stable and transparent tax regime.

Since such changes in law go against ease of doing business and erode investor confidence, thereby making India a less attractive investment destination. With the thrust on Make in India and the government's efforts to make India the preferred investment destination for companies exiting China after the pandemic, the government should have accepted the arbitration award and moved on. That would have boosted India's image manifold.

But it seems that the same mentality which went into drafting the legislation with retrospective effect is once again at play. It is very unlikely that any court in the world would think of it as a matter of the law as it stood. When the Vodafone deal was inked, the law was different. It was changed precisely to tax the deal. Hence, most courts (as even the Supreme Court did in India) would give relief to the company against a law that was enacted after it completed the transaction.