oppn parties Social Stock Exchange Is A Good Idea from Sebi

News Snippets

  • Maratha quota bill likely to be tabled in Maharashtra assembly today
  • Arvind Kejriwal skips ED summons for the 6th time, says the case is in court and will follow court's decision
  • PM Modi says UP has gone from 'red tape' to 'red carpet' in 7 years of 'double engine' government
  • Farm unions reject government offers, to resume Delhi march from today
  • Centre says some Aadhar cards in Bengal 'deactivated' due to technical glitz, will be activated back soon
  • Supreme Court stays LS privilege panel summons to Bengal officials over BJP MP Sukanta Majumdar injury case
  • Supreme Court junks Sandeshkhali petition, says it cannot be compared to Manipur, asks petitioner to approach Calcutta HC
  • Supreme Court gets tough on Chandigarh mayoral elections, asks for ballot papers and video footage, does not order re-election
  • Government starts withdrawing old small tax demands, up to Rs 25000 per entry till FY 2009-10 and up to Rs 10000 per entry from FY 2010-11 to FY 2014-15 with an overall ceiling of Rs 1 lakh per tax payer
  • Stocks remained positive on Monday: Sensex gained 281 points to 72708 and Nifty 81 points to 22122
  • Jasprit Bumrah likely to be rested for 4th Test while K L Rahul may be back
  • FIH Pro League hockey: India beat Spain 8-7 in shootout
  • SP leader Salim Sherwani, miffed at no Muslim candidate given RS ticket, quits party
  • Army going for big (Rs 57000cr) upgrade in combat vehicles to replace T-72 tanks
  • Mamata Banerjee says the BJP is doing nothing to resolve the Sandeshkhali dispute but instead fanning the fires to escalate it
History created in Supreme Court as Chandigarh mayoral poll ballots counted in court, judges declare AAP candidate Kuldeep Kumar winner after taking into account the votes defaced by returning officer Anil Masih
oppn parties
Social Stock Exchange Is A Good Idea from Sebi

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2021-10-06 12:58:30

It is not businesses alone that need funds. Social enterprises, whether for-profit or not-for-profit, also need funds, to run their operations. They have to depend on donations, from good Samaritans in India and abroad, similar enterprises who value their work and also from the CSR funds of companies. But if people are willing to invest in such social enterprises, why should they depend only on donations? Working on this premise, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has now announced that social enterprises, both for-profit and non-profit, will be allowed to access the stock markets through a to-be-created social stock exchange where they will be listed for trading. The enterprises will be allowed to access the equity, bond and mutual funds markets. Obviously not all social enterprises will be allowed such access. Only those working in the areas of working to eradicate hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting healthcare, education, gender equality, livelihoods and empowerment of women and LGBT communities as well as encouraging environmental sustainability, among others. They will be allowed to raise finances through social impact funds having a corpus of Rs 5 crore.

But the contours of the scheme need to be defined well since NGOs and social enterprises have not in the good books of the ruling dispensation. It has tried to block access to funds and has otherwise harassed a large number of big and small social enterprises, including many that have a global footprint. Hence there is a huge chance that rules will be drafted in such a manner that it would exclude a large number of NGOs that are doing exemplary work but are viewed with suspicion for their stand often goes against the government. That would be unfair. Although NGOs work to supplement government work in social areas, since they work among the underprivileged and the marginalized and try to highlight the difficulties faced by them, sometimes they come in conflict with the administration and the more vocal among them are always viewed with suspicion. But if the access to equity is restrictive and selective, it will fail to meet the purpose. Hence, the scheme must be well-defined, transparent and open to all that meet the stated criteria.