oppn parties Sebi Should Regulate Block Deals More Strictly

News Snippets

  • 76-year-old retired doctor dies in Hyderabad after being held to digital 'arrest'
  • Paksitan admits that India had rejected thrid-party role in ending the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack
  • Supreme Court seeks reply from the states about anti-conversion laws
  • Calcutta HC rules that a man cannot deny maintaenance to his wife just because she is earning
  • Stocks rebound on Tuesday: Sensex gains 594 points to 82380 and Nifty gains 169 points to 25239
  • China Masters badminton: PV Sindhu reaches second round but Ayush Shetty knocked out
  • World Wrestling Championships: Male wresters draw a blank and wone continue to struggle, showing that India is losing out in a sport where it once excelled
  • Speed Skating World Championships: Anandkumar Velkumar becomes the first Indian to win gold in 100m inline sprint. This comes after his bronze in the 500m event
  • BCCI ropes in Apollo Tyres as new jersey sponsor after Dream 11 had to bow out due to the ban on online gaming companies, to get Rs 200cr more
  • World Athletics: High jumper Sarvesh Anil Kushare finishes an impressive sixth
  • A study has found that the Red Fort in Delhi is turning black due to air pollution
  • PM Modi asks defence ministry to achieve greater integration among armed forces
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay the entire Waqf Act but stays some provisions it finds bad in law
  • Supreme Court closes Vantara zoo case in Jamnagar after the SIT clears the body tasked with maintaining it. Says it will entertain no further complaints in the matter
  • Supreme Court says bringing political parties under POSH Act will liekly become a tool for blackmail
Sebi dismisses Hindenberg's claim against Adani group companies ////// Neeraj Chopra finishes 8th at World Athletics
oppn parties
Sebi Should Regulate Block Deals More Strictly

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2021-01-09 02:39:51

Block deals, even though conducted as per Sebi rules and within the trading parameters of the stock exchanges, do generate suspicion of insider trading as people would always question the need for conducting a block trade and the timing of such trade. There will always be suspicion that those in the know (like brokerage houses or institutional investors) of such bulk deals use the knowledge to conduct independent trades ahead of the deals and enjoy extra benefit that is not available to the ordinary shareholder. But these deals can also be need based, or based on the question of demand and supply, and there might not be an element of speculation involved. Still, convincing others for that is tough as Sebi might be realizing after a number of big-ticket foreign portfolio investors (FPI) have complained to it about 'underhand' block deals and the insider knowledge that is allowing some entities to gain from them.

As per current rules in place, these deals can be conducted in a special trading window or during normal trading hours also at stock exchanges and the pricing should not be more than 1% in variance with the closing market price on the previous day. The other condition is that the whole deal should be more than 0.5% of the shares of the company. Sometimes, these deals are kept just below that level to prevent reporting. But those who know that such a deal is going to happen can always profit from their insider knowledge by trading in the said shares before the deal is actually conducted. For instance, if an institutional investor is buying in bulk, the price might rise and people will insider knowledge will also buy in small lots to profit from the rise in price. On the other hand, if a big investor is selling in bulk, those with knowledge will also short sell to profit from it.

Although these are unethical deals in the strictest sense, but there is little that Sebi can actually do to prevent them. For, those with insider knowledge can resort to hundreds of ways to mask their trades. Neither can Sebi prevent block deals nor can it truly prevent people with insider information to profit from them. The best it can do is to study the rules that are in place for block deals in other mature markets and use them to make the process for such deals more robust and transparent in India. For, if the FPIs are miffed, the foreign fund inflow will stop. Hence, they should be allowed to operate in a market that is free of irregularities and underhand deals. Sebi must look into the matter and come out with a comprehensive regulation that makes block deals transparent and stops insider trading related to such deals.