oppn parties Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

News Snippets

  • In a first, the Supreme Court recognizes marital rape, although for the limited purpose of allowing married women the right of abortion up to 24 weeks if they conceived as a result of forced sex by their husbands
  • Air India cuts discounts on base fare to students and senior citizens from 50% to 25%
  • Mallikarjun Kharge and Digvijay Singh are being touted as frontrunners to take on Shashi Tharoor in the elections for the post of Congress president
  • Sonia Gandhi will decide who will be Rajasthan CM if she feels there is a need to change guard after the near-rebellion by MLAs in the state
  • Ashok Gehlot bowed out of the race for being Congress president after meeting Sonia Gandhi
  • India has moved to the 40th spot in the innovation index, up 6 spots from last year
  • DGGI has alleged that top insurance companies, banks and NBFCs has committed a fraud of Rs 800cr by claiming input tax credit without underlying supplies
  • The Centre will borrow Rs 10000cr less than planned earlier due to good revenue collections
  • At $23.9bn, India's current account deficit widened to 2.8% in Q1, the worst in four years
  • Stocks continue to flounder on Thursday: Sensex sheds 188 points to 56409 and Nifty 40 points to 16818
  • The 36th National Games were declared open on Thusrday by PM Modi in front of a record crowd in Motera near Ahmedabad
  • Jasprit Bumrah most likely to miss T20 World Cup due to recurrence of back injury
  • PFI's political wing, the SDPI is on EC radar and action will follow soon if discrepancies are detected
  • Ashok Gehlot to meet Sonia Gandhi today, says all issues will be sorted out soon
  • Referring to the PFI ban, most Muslim organizations ask the government to take similar action against right wings organizations like the RSS, Bajrang Dal, VHP and the like
In a landmark order, Supreme Court rules that all women, married or unmarried, are entitled to safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy as per the MTP Act
oppn parties
Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-24 06:36:38

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

It is very difficult, almost impossible, to change tax laws with retrospective effect and then demand huge amounts as tax arrears from foreign companies, sometimes bypassing tax treaties between nations. The Indian government has been made to understand this in the most embarrassing manner by first losing the Vodafone case and now the Cairn Energy case in the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague.

In the Cairn Energy case, the Indian income tax department had seized 10 percent shares of the Indian subsidiary of the company, then valued at over $ 1 billion as the company had disputed and refused to pay the tax demand raised on it. The court of arbitration has now held that seizure illegal and has ordered the government to refund the amount along with interest and costs. The total outgo for the government, as per the order, will be about $1.4 billion.

The dispute with Cairn arose as it reorganized its business in India after obtaining permission from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board. None of the government departments raised any objections or indicated that the company would have to pay such huge taxes. But later, the company was asked to pay capital gains tax with retrospective effect on the reorganization of assets. That also went against the tax treaty India has with the UK. The court has now ruled that the company did not receive fair and equitable treatment under the bilateral investment treaty between India and the UK.

The Indian government has the right to appeal against the award. But transparency in laws and ease of doing business are prime factors to attract foreign investment. The government must acknowledge that. Hence, in order to boost the confidence of foreign investors and give a fillip to the Make in India initiative, it should accept the mistake, pay the wrongfully retained amount and move on. In future, it should desist from changing the goalposts after the match has started and refrain from introducing laws with retrospective effect.