oppn parties Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-24 06:36:38

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is very difficult, almost impossible, to change tax laws with retrospective effect and then demand huge amounts as tax arrears from foreign companies, sometimes bypassing tax treaties between nations. The Indian government has been made to understand this in the most embarrassing manner by first losing the Vodafone case and now the Cairn Energy case in the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague.

In the Cairn Energy case, the Indian income tax department had seized 10 percent shares of the Indian subsidiary of the company, then valued at over $ 1 billion as the company had disputed and refused to pay the tax demand raised on it. The court of arbitration has now held that seizure illegal and has ordered the government to refund the amount along with interest and costs. The total outgo for the government, as per the order, will be about $1.4 billion.

The dispute with Cairn arose as it reorganized its business in India after obtaining permission from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board. None of the government departments raised any objections or indicated that the company would have to pay such huge taxes. But later, the company was asked to pay capital gains tax with retrospective effect on the reorganization of assets. That also went against the tax treaty India has with the UK. The court has now ruled that the company did not receive fair and equitable treatment under the bilateral investment treaty between India and the UK.

The Indian government has the right to appeal against the award. But transparency in laws and ease of doing business are prime factors to attract foreign investment. The government must acknowledge that. Hence, in order to boost the confidence of foreign investors and give a fillip to the Make in India initiative, it should accept the mistake, pay the wrongfully retained amount and move on. In future, it should desist from changing the goalposts after the match has started and refrain from introducing laws with retrospective effect.