oppn parties 'Retrospective Tax' Does Not Pass Muster, Vodafone Not Required To Pay The Demand Of Rs 20000 Crore

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court sentences Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu to one year rigorous imprisonment in the 1988 road rage case
  • Home Minister Amit Shah says rights should not be demanded before fulfilling responsibilities and that universities are no place to wage ideological battles
  • NIA court convicts JKLF chief Yasin Malik in terror funding case after he pleads guilty of all charges
  • A study backed by PM-EAC has recommended universal basic income and urban job guarantee and greater spend on social sector schemes
  • Supreme Court rules that the decisions of the GST Council are not binding on the Centre and the states, leaving the door open for states to levy further taxes
  • After sustained campaign by BJP MP Arjun Singh, the Centre today withdrew the jute price cap order, industry welcomes move
  • Akasa Air might postpone its July launch due to late arrival of aircrafts
  • Metro Cash & Carry decides to sell Indian operations. All major players, including Reliance retail and Amazon, are likely to bid
  • Local and global cues spook the markets on Friday - Sensex crashes 1416 points to 52792 and Nifty by 430 points to 15809
  • IPL: RCB crushes GT by 8 wickets as Virat Kohli returns to form with a well-made half century
  • Nikhat Zareen is world champion in flyweight category. Wins gold at Women's World Championships at Instanbul
  • Supreme Court uses its special powers under Article 124 to release A G Perarivalan, a Rajiv Gandhi assassination convict
  • Indrani Mukherjea, prime accused in the Sheena Bora murder case, gets bail from Supreme Court after 6.5 years in jail
  • Hardik Patel quits Congress, says top leaders distracted by mobile phones and state leadership busy arranging 'chicken sandwiches' for them
  • Anil Baijal resigns as Lieutenant Governor of Delhi citing "personal reasons"
Nikhat Zareen is crowned world champion in the flyweight (52Kg) category at the Women's World Championships in Istanbul /////// Supreme Court sentences Navjot Singh Sidhu to rigorous imprisonment of one year in the road rage case /////// Sunil Jakhar, who quit the Congress a few days ago, joins the BJP
oppn parties
'Retrospective Tax' Does Not Pass Muster, Vodafone Not Required To Pay The Demand Of Rs 20000 Crore

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-09-25 20:45:15

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The retrospective tax got a huge kick on the backside today when an international court in The Hague ruled that it violated the investment treaty between India and Netherlands in the case between the Indian government and Vodafone. Consequently, India lost the case and Vodafone is not required to pay nearly Rs 20000 crore that was levied as interest and penalties with retrospective effect when the Income Tax department had ruled that the company had to pay these amounts on its acquisition of the Indian assets of Hutchison Whampoa (Hutch) in 2007.

Vodafone had disputed that and had even won the case in the Supreme Court. But the then UPA II government had changed the rules and made it applicable from retrospective effect. India Inc. had protested this 'retrospective tax'. It amounted to changing the goal posts after the match had started and it was an unethical thing to do. If Vodafone had known beforehand that its acquisition of Hutch would entail an additional payment of Rs 20000 crore as interest and penalties, it would have negotiated the deal differently.

Fairness and transparency in taxation demands that even if the government stands to lose substantial revenue, rules must not be changed with retrospective effect. It makes a country a hostile investment destination if the government keeps changing tax rules to fleece investors, especially when the rule was not there when they first came in. The 'retrospective tax' was widely criticized then but the then government stuck to its guns. Perhaps losing the arbitration case now will drill some sense in the bureaucracy and they will not come up with such fancy stuff in future.

In India wants to be the preferred destination for companies looking to move out of China post the pandemic, it has to spell out all its policies in black and white with a caveat that rules will not change with retrospective effect to harm done deals. The difficulty overseas companies face in doing business in India is one of the biggest reasons that despite the hype around 'Make in India' the country is not seeing even 5 percent of what was invested in China. Although the NDA government is trying, it is not enough. We have to junk outdated thinking and the propensity to change rules at the drop of a hat. On the ease of doing business, we are nowhere even near to the countries competing with us to lure the companies that are expected to look for investment destinations if and when they move out of China.