oppn parties PMO Orders Review Of Proposal To Issue Overseas Bonds

News Snippets

  • T20 WC: USA enter Super Eights as their last match against Ireland gets washed out. They were ahead of Pakistan in the points tally. Pakistan were eliminated
  • T20 WC: USA enter Super Eights as their last match against Ireland gets washed out. They were ahead of Pakistan in the points tally. Pakistan were eliminated
  • BJD leader and former Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik said that the criticism of his aide V K Pandian is "regrettable"
  • As more than 20 BJP ministers lost in the recent elections, the new Union cabinet will have many new faces from the party
  • Congress Working committee asks Rahul Gandhi to take up the position of Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha. Gandhi says he will consider the request
  • RBI governor Shaktikanta Das said that gold was shifted to India as the quantum of RBI gold abroad had increased due to recent purchases
  • Delhi HC rules that submitting photographic evidence of adultery will not be enough, they will have to be proved as authentic in the age of deepfakes
  • A four-member panel will review NEET-UG results of 1563 candidates to check if they were given extra marks for exam time loss
  • Mamata Banerjee says her party will not join Modi's oath-taking ceremony. Also says INDIA bloc might stake claim to form government later
  • K C Tyagi of the JD(U) dropped a bombshell when he said that Nitish Kumar was offered the post of prime minister for switching sides. Opposition leaders rubbished the claim
  • This May was India's hottest month in 36 years says IMD
  • T20 WC: India take on Pakistan today. Telecast to begin at 8pm IST
  • T20 WC: Afghanistan stun New Zealand and Bangladesh win against Sri Lanka
  • T20 World Cup: Australia beat England by 36 runs. This spoils England's chances of making the playoffs as they have lost both their matches till now
  • Heat wave continues in the country as monsoon moves slow
G7 commits to promote India-Europe corridor
oppn parties
PMO Orders Review Of Proposal To Issue Overseas Bonds

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Is Subash Chandra Garg, the former finance secretary now shunted to the power department (he has since applied for voluntary retirement), being made the fall guy for the controversial proposal to float sovereign bonds to borrow from the overseas market as announced in the budget by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman? The Telegraph has published a news story by R Suryamurthy on its front page that alleges that after criticism of the proposal from several quarters, the PMO has ordered a review and Garg is being made the scapegoat. It also hints that the proposal is most likely to be shelved. However, unnamed  government sources say Garg did not properly apprise the PMO of the consequences of borrowing through overseas sovereign bonds.

Experts, including former RBI governors Y V Reddy and Raghuram Rajan, are skeptical about the need and efficacy of adopting this route. While Reddy is of the opinion that these bonds are like sovereign liabilities in perpetuity, Rajan feels that the better way to get dollar funds would be to raise the cap for foreign investments in G-secs or government securities. Rathin Roy, a member of the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council, opposes the proposal because he says it will affect India's economic sovereignty and have disastrous macroeconomic consequences. Swadeshi Jagran Manch, the economic think-tank of the RSS, has also opposed the proposal.

It is surprising that Sitharaman could announce the proposal without extensive consultations within the government and with domain experts from outside. Normally a proposal of such importance (remember, India has not used this borrowing route ever before) is discussed thoroughly and even vetted by several government departments before being made public. Without going into the merits and demerits of borrowing in overseas markets by floating sovereign bonds, it needs to be stated that just an idea that was not properly discussed or approved should not have found a place in the budget announcements. It gives the impression that decisions are being made arbitrarily.