oppn parties No Respite For Telecom Companies, Supreme Court Says Non-Payment Would Amount To Contempt

News Snippets

  • Rape-accused AAP MLA from Punjab, Harmeet Singh Pathanmajra, escaped after gunshots were fired when the police came to arrest him in Karnal in Haryana
  • Government has lifted the ban on producing ethanol from molasses
  • Delhi riot case: Delhi HC denies bail to Umar Kahlid, Sharjeel Imam and eight others
  • PM Modi says that the use of indecent language by the Congress against his dead mother is an insult to all women
  • Supreme Court says if the court can clear all pending bills, it might as well step into the governor's shoes while TN government asks it to set timelines for the governor
  • Indrani Mukherjea's duaghter Vidhie has claimed that her statements to the police and the CBI were 'forged and fabricated' to implicate her parents
  • BRS supremo K Chandrasekhar Rao has expelled his daughter K Kavitha from the party for anti-party activities
  • PM Modi said that the world trusts India with semiconductor future
  • FM Nirmala Sitharaman says the economy is set to become transparent once next-generation GST reforms are unleashed
  • Markets turn negative on Tuesday: Sensex sheds 207 points to 80158 and Nifty lost 45 points to close at 24580
  • After Dream 11's withdrawal (due to ban on online gaming companies), BCCI has invited bids for Team India's lead sponsor
  • Hockey - Asia Cup: India to play South Korea in the Super-4
  • PM Modi confers with Chinese Premier Xi and Russian President Putin on the sidelines of the SCO
  • US Prez Trump calls trade with India a 'one-sided disaster'
  • Supreme Court asks why minority institutions are left out of the ambit of RTE, will re-examine its 2014 ruling
Commerce minister Piyush Goyal hoepful of trade deal with the US by November
oppn parties
No Respite For Telecom Companies, Supreme Court Says Non-Payment Would Amount To Contempt

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-03-19 11:40:32

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Supreme Court bench hearing the adjusted gross revenue (AGR) case flew into a rage when the government filed a plea for a reassessment of dues and granting the telcos a twenty-year window to make staggered payments. The judges were categorical in saying that there was no question of looking at any "self-assessment" by the telecom companies as that amounts to a fraud on the nation. They were of the view that when the government had estimated the dues and the same were audited and billed to the telcos and consequently approved as correct and in order by the Supreme Court, there was no need for a reassessment. In fact, the court said that "we will be party to fraud if we allow self-assessment of AGR dues by telecom companies" and it "cannot be permitted in the wildest dreams".

When the AGR case was proceeding in the Supreme Court, the government fought tooth and nail to realize what it had billed as dues to the telcos. It did not concede an inch and countered all arguments put forward by the companies with an inflexible attitude. It knew then too that with the highest spectrum fees and lowest rates for services in the world, the telcos were not in a position to pay the AGR along with penalties and interest. Yet, it chose to ignore all petitions by the companies and the considered opinion of experts and went ahead with its arguments based solely on the initial (flawed, for it added "other income" to the core income from telecom business in calculating the AGR) contract it had signed with the telecom companies.

After the Supreme Court order and especially after Vodafone-Idea clearly said that it was in no position to pay the Rs 58000cr demanded from it and will have to wind up its business in India, the government started thinking of a bailout package. But it seems it is too late for that. The ideal time was when the telcos had approached it when the case was being heard in the Supreme Court. The government could have then come to an understanding where the telcos could have been made to pay the actual assessed amount with a token penalty and some interest. That would have settled the matter without putting stress on the companies and not causing much loss to the exchequer.

But now, after the dues have been certified by the Supreme Court, that time has passed. The court was right in saying that any deviation from its order would amount to contempt of court and if that happens, the court would be constrained to call the managing directors of each of the companies and send them to jail directly from the court. It was also critical of the media for publishing articles questioning the court's previous order. It said that the telcos were trying to influence the court via the media. It is a muddle created solely by the inflexible attitude displayed by the government earlier and it will have to think out of the box to set it right without angering the court or causing contempt.