oppn parties No Respite For Telecom Companies, Supreme Court Says Non-Payment Would Amount To Contempt

News Snippets

  • Asian TT: Ayhika Mukherjee beats two plaayers ranked much higher than her as India beat South Korea 3-2 to move to the semis and assure a medal
  • 2nd U-19 Test: India scores 492 as Harvansh Pangalia hits a ton, Australia were 142 for three in reply
  • Opposition alleges that the BJP is including the 5 nominated MLAs in its scheme of froming the government in the state
  • Calcutta HC has ruled that courts cannot cancel bail without hearing the accused
  • Lalu Prasad and his sons Tejaswi and Tej Pratap secure bail in the cash-for-jobs scam
  • Visiting Maldives President Mohamed Muizzu holds talks with PM Modi. India offers financial bail out to Maldives
  • CBI files chargesheet, says prime accused Sanjay Roy acted on his own and there seems to be no conspiracy in the heinbous act in the R G Kar rape-murder
  • Bengal government deploys bed-management system, thousands of CCTVs and panic buttons, among other things, in response to the R G Kar rape-murder
  • Government seeks public feedback on I-T law panel revamp
  • Ratan Tata has been admiited to Breach Candy hospital for routine check-ups, says he is in good spirits
  • Stocks continue losing spree for the 6th session: Sensex sheds 638 points to 81050 and Nifty 219 points to 24796
  • Another Pandya, this time Nitin J (not related to Hardik and Krunal) shines with a valiant 94 against the Australian U-19 team in the 2nd Test
  • Railways to revert to pre-2019 hiring policy, to hold civil and engineering recruitment tests again
  • 7 of family die in Chembur slum in Mumbai after a fire likely sparked by a diya razed their house
  • An estimated 15 lakh people turned up to witness the Chennai air show leading to four deaths and 90 people hospitalised due to dehydration and fainting
BJP defies odds and exit polls to win a third consecutive term in Haryana while NC-Congress sweep J&K
oppn parties
No Respite For Telecom Companies, Supreme Court Says Non-Payment Would Amount To Contempt

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-03-19 11:40:32

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Supreme Court bench hearing the adjusted gross revenue (AGR) case flew into a rage when the government filed a plea for a reassessment of dues and granting the telcos a twenty-year window to make staggered payments. The judges were categorical in saying that there was no question of looking at any "self-assessment" by the telecom companies as that amounts to a fraud on the nation. They were of the view that when the government had estimated the dues and the same were audited and billed to the telcos and consequently approved as correct and in order by the Supreme Court, there was no need for a reassessment. In fact, the court said that "we will be party to fraud if we allow self-assessment of AGR dues by telecom companies" and it "cannot be permitted in the wildest dreams".

When the AGR case was proceeding in the Supreme Court, the government fought tooth and nail to realize what it had billed as dues to the telcos. It did not concede an inch and countered all arguments put forward by the companies with an inflexible attitude. It knew then too that with the highest spectrum fees and lowest rates for services in the world, the telcos were not in a position to pay the AGR along with penalties and interest. Yet, it chose to ignore all petitions by the companies and the considered opinion of experts and went ahead with its arguments based solely on the initial (flawed, for it added "other income" to the core income from telecom business in calculating the AGR) contract it had signed with the telecom companies.

After the Supreme Court order and especially after Vodafone-Idea clearly said that it was in no position to pay the Rs 58000cr demanded from it and will have to wind up its business in India, the government started thinking of a bailout package. But it seems it is too late for that. The ideal time was when the telcos had approached it when the case was being heard in the Supreme Court. The government could have then come to an understanding where the telcos could have been made to pay the actual assessed amount with a token penalty and some interest. That would have settled the matter without putting stress on the companies and not causing much loss to the exchequer.

But now, after the dues have been certified by the Supreme Court, that time has passed. The court was right in saying that any deviation from its order would amount to contempt of court and if that happens, the court would be constrained to call the managing directors of each of the companies and send them to jail directly from the court. It was also critical of the media for publishing articles questioning the court's previous order. It said that the telcos were trying to influence the court via the media. It is a muddle created solely by the inflexible attitude displayed by the government earlier and it will have to think out of the box to set it right without angering the court or causing contempt.