oppn parties Is FSSAI Compromising Its Position By Getting Big Food Companies To Sponsor Its Initiatives?

News Snippets

  • Calcutta HC said that an accused in a NDPS case is not entitled to default bail if a charge sheet, even without the chemical report, is filed within time
  • 21 killed in a hooch tragedy in Amritsar. Police arrested 10 persons
  • Incoming CJI Justice B R Gavai said that he will always strive for social and political justice
  • Although US Prez Donald trump once again claimed his administration brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, India clearly refuted the claim and said it was workd out by the DGMO
  • Centre tells the Supreme Court that since women are not in combat roles, there has to be a separate selection board for them
  • India briefs 70 nations on Operation Sindoor
  • PM Modi asks Pakistan to vacate illegally-occupied portions of Kashmir
  • PM Modi tells Pakistan that it faces annihilation if it does not stop supporting terror
  • PM Modi visits Adampur IAF base, poses before the S-400 surface-to-air defence system to destrot Pakistan's claim that it had bombed the base and destroyed the defence system
  • 5 US companies make offers to GAIL for stake in LNG projects
  • Retail inflation dipped to 3.2% in April, the lowest since July 2019
  • Stocks tumble on Tuesday: After the all-time single-day gain on Monday, stocks lost heavily on Tuesday - Sensex went down by 1281 points to 81148 and Nifty lost 346 points to 24578
  • Indian tour to England: A new look Indian team with a new skipper will be announced when the selectors meet later this week in view of the retirement of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and R Ashwin
  • IPL: Most overseas players to return and teams likely to be full strength
  • Sharad Pawar calls for an all-party meet to discuss Operation Sindoor, says such matter cannot be publicly discussed in Parliament as the Congress had earlier demanded
PM Modi warns Pakistan - stop supporting terror or face annihilation /////// Also asks Pakistan to vacate illegally-occupied portion of Kashmir
oppn parties
Is FSSAI Compromising Its Position By Getting Big Food Companies To Sponsor Its Initiatives?

By Linus Garg

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

Nowadays, conflict of interest has become a big issue. Anyone or anything seen as even remotely connected in any capacity to anyone or anything that it promotes or partners immediately raises concerns of conflict of interest. Hence, when it came to light that big food companies and trade organizations that represent the interests of these companies (and often lobby for them to get government policies suitably altered in their favour) were partnering the food regulator Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, FSSAI, in its various initiatives to educate the people about the right food to eat and get the companies to commit to lowering harmful ingredients in packaged food, activists and the media accused it of sleeping with the 'enemy'.

Obviously, and on the face of it, involving food companies in any of its initiatives immediately opens FSSAI to charges of conflict of interest. To cozy up (and take their money) to those whom one is expected to regulate is not a done thing. The initiatives which the FSSAI has taken up, like "Eat Right India", for instance, need a lot of awareness campaigns including media advertising and events. All such things cost lots of money. When such partnerships are struck with food companies, they will foot the bill. Also, such partnerships will mean that FSSAI officials and those of the food companies will remain in constant touch over long periods of time and forge friendships. These friendships can be used to influence the decisions of the food regulator in the future.

Of course, these are all just speculations. The FSSAI can obviously keep its regulatory role at a distance from its role as an educator. Even after taking money from the food companies, it can be strict with them and tell them that it is doing the work (of educating the consumer) that ideally they, or their trade bodies, should have done. It could impress upon them that unless they strictly adhere to the norms of lower harmful ingredients, they would be named and shamed. Instead of alleging that FSSAI is compromising its position, one can say that the regulator is doing the opposite by involving the food companies in the campaigns so that it can influence them in a positive way.