oppn parties IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

By Slogger
First publised on 2022-01-11 14:32:34

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Holding an extreme view and carting the ball out of the park is what interests him most. He is a hard hitter at all times. Fasten your seatbelts and read.

In an excellent development, the BCCI has facilitated a deal between the Tatas and the Chinese mobile handset maker Vivo through which Vivo will exit from the sponsorship of the IPL this year and the Tatas will step in. Vivo had earlier said that it was not getting traction through IPL sponsorship as it was paying a huge amount every year. It was looking to get out of the deal but the terms were such that it would have to bring a replacement on board or otherwise fulfill its financial commitments for the entire duration of the contract. Through this deal, which is win-win situation for all concerned, Vivo has been allowed a smooth exit route.

Vivo's sponsorship of the IPL has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Earlier, there was political bickering when it first came on board. Later the company realized that the investment was way more than the traction it was getting. Now, with the investigating agencies on the back of all Chinese handset makers operating in India, things are turning impossible. The deal with Vivo, signed in 2017 for Rs 2199cr for five years meant a payout of Rs 440cr every year. Vivo wanted out but was constrained by the replacement clause.

Although the terms of the deal signed by the BCCI with the Tatas have not been made public, Jay Shah, the BCCI honorary secretary issued a statement where he welcomed the Tatas as sponsors by saying that "we are truly happy that India's largest and most trusted business groups has believed in the IPL story and together with the Tata Group, we will look to take Indian cricket and the IPL forward to greater heights."

But the problems faced by Vivo should lead to a rethink on long term sponsorship contracts with binding clauses when such huge sums are involved. Although getting a sponsor on board is a time consuming process and also involves costs, the way out could be inviting bids for five years at a time but with separate yearly contracts. The deal could then be awarded to a single sponsor for all the five years or to multiple sponsors for one or more years.