oppn parties Hate Speech Case: Different Yardstick For Religious Leaders?

News Snippets

  • Amidst loud attack on the government for trying to change the Constitution, PM Modi says the Constitution is Gita, Bible and Quran for the BJP government
  • PM Modi says Congress circulating meat cooking and eating videos during Navratri and the month of Savan is indicative of its 'Mughal' mindset
  • Medical journal Lancet has said that medical data from India needs more transparency for correct analysis and policy action
  • India issues advisory for citizens to refrain from travelling to Iran and Israel as conflict escalates in the Middle-East
  • Rameshwaram Cafe blast accused arrested in Bengal hid in several Kolkata lodges before going to Digha in Medinipore from where they were arrested in a joint operation by the NIA and the state police
  • AAP leader Atishi says Centre is laying the groundwork to impose President's rule in Delhi
  • Elon Musk likely to discuss Starlink too with PM Modi
  • Elon Musk likely to discuss Starlink too with PM Modi
  • Currency in circulation rose by Rs 1.3 lakh crore in one year from FY23 to FY24
  • Gold jumps to nearly Rs 74000/ 10gm on MCX
  • Retail inflation was at 5-month low in March and IIP was at 4-month high
  • Stock markets crash on Friday - Sensex tumbles 793 points to 74244 and Nifty 234 points to 22519
  • Legendary boxer Mary Kom resigns as chef-de-mission of Paris Olympics squad citing personal reasons
  • IPL: DC beat LSG by 4 wickets as Kuldeep Yadav bowls a dream spell to restrict LSG to just 167
  • Bombay HC says Senior Citizens Act not a tool to settle property disputes but a law to ensure that seniors are not treated harshly and to resotre residential rights in houses they might have gifted to their children in their lifetime
West Bengal Police helps NIA arrest two Rameshwaram Cafe blast accused from Digha
oppn parties
Hate Speech Case: Different Yardstick For Religious Leaders?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-01-14 11:20:43

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

The Uttarakhand police have stirred into action in the Haridwar hate speech case after the Supreme Court issued a notice asking for an action taken report. But that this action is just to have something to put on paper before the court is obvious as till now they have only arrested Jitendra Narayan Singh Tiwari, alias Wasim Rizvi, one of the many accused in the case. Notably, they failed to arrest Yati Narshinghanand or Sadhvi Annapurna, the religious leaders mentioned in the FIR (although they have been summoned for questioning). This is despite the fact that when Tiwari was arrested, he was travelling with Narshinghanand and the latter even asked the police that why are they taking action only against Tiwari when he (Narshinghanand) is a co-accused.

One fails to understand what is stopping the police from arresting the other two when evidence in the form of widely circulated videos of the hate speech already exists in public domain. By arresting Tiwari alone, the police are discriminating as they should also have called him first for questioning as they have called Narshinghanand and Annapurna. Or are there different rules for religious leaders and others?

With the Supreme Court hearing the matter, it is just a matter of time before the police will have to conduct a thorough investigation and arrest the accused. Then even political backing will not be enough to shield them from arrest. That the accused have not applied for anticipatory bail just shows how secure they think they are by virtue of their connections and elevated status as religious leaders. But once the wheels of law start turning, they will not be spared.

What others have been arrested for under the sedition law seems childish when compared to the kind of inflammatory, divisive, hate-mongering and blatantly anti-national speeches made at the so-called Dharam Sansad in Haridwar. Calling for genocide of fellow citizens is like calling for civil war. Hopefully, the Supreme Court will punish the guilty as per the law of the land.