oppn parties GST: Why Impose Cess?

News Snippets

  • 76-year-old retired doctor dies in Hyderabad after being held to digital 'arrest'
  • Paksitan admits that India had rejected thrid-party role in ending the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack
  • Supreme Court seeks reply from the states about anti-conversion laws
  • Calcutta HC rules that a man cannot deny maintaenance to his wife just because she is earning
  • Stocks rebound on Tuesday: Sensex gains 594 points to 82380 and Nifty gains 169 points to 25239
  • China Masters badminton: PV Sindhu reaches second round but Ayush Shetty knocked out
  • World Wrestling Championships: Male wresters draw a blank and wone continue to struggle, showing that India is losing out in a sport where it once excelled
  • Speed Skating World Championships: Anandkumar Velkumar becomes the first Indian to win gold in 100m inline sprint. This comes after his bronze in the 500m event
  • BCCI ropes in Apollo Tyres as new jersey sponsor after Dream 11 had to bow out due to the ban on online gaming companies, to get Rs 200cr more
  • World Athletics: High jumper Sarvesh Anil Kushare finishes an impressive sixth
  • A study has found that the Red Fort in Delhi is turning black due to air pollution
  • PM Modi asks defence ministry to achieve greater integration among armed forces
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay the entire Waqf Act but stays some provisions it finds bad in law
  • Supreme Court closes Vantara zoo case in Jamnagar after the SIT clears the body tasked with maintaining it. Says it will entertain no further complaints in the matter
  • Supreme Court says bringing political parties under POSH Act will liekly become a tool for blackmail
Sebi dismisses Hindenberg's claim against Adani group companies ////// Neeraj Chopra finishes 8th at World Athletics
oppn parties
GST: Why Impose Cess?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-11-04 08:54:00

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
The GST Council, in its collective wisdom, still thinks that imposing a cess on the highest taxed slab of so-called sin goods is necessary. But it goes against the principle of GST which was envisioned and designed to subsume all cesses. Any compensatory pool could have been created by earmarking a percentage from sin goods for that purpose, while taxing them at a still higher percentage. Once a precedent for imposing cess is put in place, it is likely to be abused on the smallest of pretexts.

The other decisions of keeping daily essentials out of the ambit and taxing other regular necessities at just 5% need to be welcomed. But the government will have to ensure that companies pass on the benefits to the consumer and do not increase prices to realize the stated benefit of less inflationary pressure. It also needs to be ensured that most other products and services come under the 18% slab. Luxury items taxed at 28% should exclude smaller petrol and electric cars.

It is good that a consensus has been reached on the rates. It will ensure an early roll-out. The Council should rethink the cess and exemptions should be kept at a minimum. The focus should now be on the IT backbone, the training of staff and the actual transition. The teething problems can be sorted out once GST is up and rolling.