oppn parties Fair & Lovely: No More 'Fair', But Still Use It To Be 'Lovely'

News Snippets

  • Rape-accused AAP MLA from Punjab, Harmeet Singh Pathanmajra, escaped after gunshots were fired when the police came to arrest him in Karnal in Haryana
  • Government has lifted the ban on producing ethanol from molasses
  • Delhi riot case: Delhi HC denies bail to Umar Kahlid, Sharjeel Imam and eight others
  • PM Modi says that the use of indecent language by the Congress against his dead mother is an insult to all women
  • Supreme Court says if the court can clear all pending bills, it might as well step into the governor's shoes while TN government asks it to set timelines for the governor
  • Indrani Mukherjea's duaghter Vidhie has claimed that her statements to the police and the CBI were 'forged and fabricated' to implicate her parents
  • BRS supremo K Chandrasekhar Rao has expelled his daughter K Kavitha from the party for anti-party activities
  • PM Modi said that the world trusts India with semiconductor future
  • FM Nirmala Sitharaman says the economy is set to become transparent once next-generation GST reforms are unleashed
  • Markets turn negative on Tuesday: Sensex sheds 207 points to 80158 and Nifty lost 45 points to close at 24580
  • After Dream 11's withdrawal (due to ban on online gaming companies), BCCI has invited bids for Team India's lead sponsor
  • Hockey - Asia Cup: India to play South Korea in the Super-4
  • PM Modi confers with Chinese Premier Xi and Russian President Putin on the sidelines of the SCO
  • US Prez Trump calls trade with India a 'one-sided disaster'
  • Supreme Court asks why minority institutions are left out of the ambit of RTE, will re-examine its 2014 ruling
Commerce minister Piyush Goyal hoepful of trade deal with the US by November
oppn parties
Fair & Lovely: No More 'Fair', But Still Use It To Be 'Lovely'

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2020-06-26 21:07:31

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

After nearly 40 years of leading Indian women to think that a fair tone of skin was better, HUL has now decided to drop the word fair from its popular skin tone enhancement brand "Fair & Lovely".  But it is not going to drop the product; instead, it is going to reposition it as a radiance product. Shall we then be thankful for small mercies or berate the company for being extra smart? For, even though the word fair will be removed and the cream would be repositioned, word of mouth will still induce girls to use it as a fairness cream. HUL should have withdrawn it altogether if it was so concerned about the adverse health and psychological effects of the product.

While HUL's current action is largely due to the worldwide protests against discrimination based on the colour of the skin following the death of George Floyd in the US, activists in India have for long railed against companies making fairness products which they said made girls feel inferior because of their natural skin tone, caused gender discrimination and stereotyping and harm the skin as most of them were made using bleach. Actor Nandita Das has been the most vocal against these products and has been running a successful and diverse campaign against them. Other actors like Ranbir Kapoor and Taapasee Pannu have refused advertising contracts or withdrawn from events sponsored by such companies. Stars from Mumbai or South who endorsed such products were often criticized for doing so.

HUL had changed its tag lines on Fair & Lovely in the recent past, but words like "skin clarity" and "superior brightness" did not leave anything to the imagination and were but mere substitutes for "the fairness cream" or "daily fairness expert" used earlier. One good thing about it is that since the market leader is taking action, others are thinking along the same lines. Most other companies making similar fairness products have indicated that they will also reposition their brands. If these companies are seriously concerned about making a difference, they should drop these products altogether and come out with a new brand to help in 'radiating' the skin or whatever they feel their product will do. But they should not promote inferiority complex in girls just because of their natural skin tone and make them feel that they need to lighten it or make it glow to be more acceptable.