oppn parties E-Commerce Policy: Putting Price Restrictions Not Government's Job

News Snippets

  • EC slams Congress for raising doubts about Haryana results
  • Omar Abdullah says he hopes the Centre will keep its promise of restoring statehood for J&K
  • BJP gets a historic third term in Haryana by bagging 48 seats, a majority on its own, while Congress gets 37
  • National Conference-Congress alliance sweeps the polls in J&K, winning 49 out of 90 seats while the BJP bags 29
  • More than 50 senior R G Kar doctors send in 'mass resignation', Bengal government officials say it has no legal validity
  • Additional districts judge Anirban Das will hear the R G Kar rape-murder case in camera four days a week from November 4
  • Stocks break 6-day losing streak as Haryana poll results buoy the markets -Sensex gains 585 points to 81635 and Nifty 217 points to 25013
  • IOC president P T Usha denies allegations in CAG report that extension of Reliance contract had resulted in a loss of Rs 24cr to the sports body
  • 2nd T20 versus Bangladesh: India look to seal series with another commanding win today at New Delhi
  • Women's T20 World Cup: India take on Sri Lanka today in a bid to win and shore up their net run rate to keep afloat in the tournament
  • Asian TT: Ayhika Mukherjee beats two players ranked much higher than her as India beat South Korea 3-2 to move to the semis and assure a medal
  • 2nd U-19 Test: India scores 492 as Harvansh Pangalia hits a ton, Australia were 142 for three in reply
  • Opposition alleges that the BJP is including the 5 nominated MLAs in its scheme of froming the government in the state
  • Calcutta HC has ruled that courts cannot cancel bail without hearing the accused
  • Lalu Prasad and his sons Tejaswi and Tej Pratap secure bail in the cash-for-jobs scam
BJP defies odds and exit polls to win a third consecutive term in Haryana while NC-Congress sweep J&K
oppn parties
E-Commerce Policy: Putting Price Restrictions Not Government's Job

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-08-01 20:40:13

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
The government has come out with a draft e-commerce policy. This can be both good and bad news for a sector that has hitherto existed and developed in a policy vacuum. The policy can be good because it will set legal parameters that would put entry restrictions, thereby eliminating fly-by-night operators who give the trade a bad name. As per reports, the policy is going to be India-centric and is likely to benefit the domestic economy.

The bad news is that the government is also thinking of fixing floor prices of products and outlaw deep discounts or discounts below a threshold. Although one is not enamored of the deep discounting model followed by e-commerce marketplaces, one is of the view that it is their business decision and their right to price their products as they think fit. The government has no role to play in pricing and it should be left to market factors. The government is planning to introduce a sunset clause to fix the maximum duration for offering deep discount to attract new customers. But are deep discounts offered only to attract or retain customers?

It has to be recognized that some products get outdated or obsolete very fast. Take fashion wear for example. Today’s hot selling item might not fetch a tenth of the price once it goes out of fashion or newer designs are introduced. Then there is the question of size. Garments are made in all sizes. It may so happen that lots of odd sizes remain on the inventory, blocking scarce capital. Seasonal items like pullovers, cardigans, shawls etc. also need to be liquidated as the winter comes to an end. Doesn’t it make sense then to sell them off at a deep discount? In any case, some items are priced at fantastic markups when freshly introduced and cover their costs after selling a few thousand pieces. The rest of the stock can then be sold at deep discounts, sometimes less than the cost price, to recoup the capital.

In any case, it is not the e-commerce platforms alone that indulge in deep discounting nowadays. All the brick and mortar stores also do that with fashion wear and other selected merchandise. In the recent sale mania in July, the big stores like Westside, Shopper’s Stop and Pantaloons, to name just three, have offered discounts ranging from 50% to 70% on a wide range of merchandise. It has become a policy with these stores to sell off old stocks periodically at hefty discounts and fill the shelves with fresh, new products that are sold at a huge premium. How is the government going to stop them?

The government is moving against deep discounting after receiving written complaints from brick and mortar stores and mobile companies who have alleged that e-commerce platforms are misusing foreign funds to offer deep discounts. Hence, instead of going after pricing, the government should go after the foreign funding and specify clearly that such funding cannot be used to offer discounts and can only be used to upgrade operations or for other operational costs. It can mandate that e-commerce companies maintain an accounting system that clearly shows how the foreign funding was put to use. That would address the issue of deep discounting too.

The market follows its own rules. There are many questions of optimal purchasing, lower overhead costs, low marketing costs and other cost saving bulk deals that can help an entrepreneur offer better prices to consumers. Any government interference in this would result in the consumer being the loser. Further, as far as e-commerce goes, there is the question of benefits derived from advances in technology, information, communications and ease of digital payments as well as improving logistics scenario. If all this translates into benefits for the consumer, the government should keep its hands off.