oppn parties All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

News Snippets

  • Maratha quota bill likely to be tabled in Maharashtra assembly today
  • Arvind Kejriwal skips ED summons for the 6th time, says the case is in court and will follow court's decision
  • PM Modi says UP has gone from 'red tape' to 'red carpet' in 7 years of 'double engine' government
  • Farm unions reject government offers, to resume Delhi march from today
  • Centre says some Aadhar cards in Bengal 'deactivated' due to technical glitz, will be activated back soon
  • Supreme Court stays LS privilege panel summons to Bengal officials over BJP MP Sukanta Majumdar injury case
  • Supreme Court junks Sandeshkhali petition, says it cannot be compared to Manipur, asks petitioner to approach Calcutta HC
  • Supreme Court gets tough on Chandigarh mayoral elections, asks for ballot papers and video footage, does not order re-election
  • Government starts withdrawing old small tax demands, up to Rs 25000 per entry till FY 2009-10 and up to Rs 10000 per entry from FY 2010-11 to FY 2014-15 with an overall ceiling of Rs 1 lakh per tax payer
  • Stocks remained positive on Monday: Sensex gained 281 points to 72708 and Nifty 81 points to 22122
  • Jasprit Bumrah likely to be rested for 4th Test while K L Rahul may be back
  • FIH Pro League hockey: India beat Spain 8-7 in shootout
  • SP leader Salim Sherwani, miffed at no Muslim candidate given RS ticket, quits party
  • Army going for big (Rs 57000cr) upgrade in combat vehicles to replace T-72 tanks
  • Mamata Banerjee says the BJP is doing nothing to resolve the Sandeshkhali dispute but instead fanning the fires to escalate it
History created in Supreme Court as Chandigarh mayoral poll ballots counted in court, judges declare AAP candidate Kuldeep Kumar winner after taking into account the votes defaced by returning officer Anil Masih
oppn parties
All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2022-01-11 05:19:53

The decision of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to amend rules to minimize CBI intervention in alleged bank fraud cases is welcome. Specifically, the CVC has said that an expert panel will recommend whether a CBI inquiry is required in bad loans above Rs 3cr (previously Rs 50cr).

Any transaction where money is lent by a bank to a customer is always open to charges of corruption and kickbacks. In many high profile cases this has actually happened. But most loan transactions are through informed decisions by bankers who look at the customer profile, credit ranking, worth of project submitted, past record of loans to similar projects, future prospects of the project and, of course, government policy, among other things, to grant the loan. It is a many layered process and involves various departments of the bank.

Thus, when a loan goes bad, it is not correct to approach the issue as something that involves corruption. There are a host of factors that can turn a loan bad. But such is the buzz around bad loans now that bank officials are easy target. This is taking a huge toll on the economy as banks turn risk averse despite being flush with funds.

The government must reduce the trust deficit and the CVC decision is a good step in that direction. Bankers have also asked it to have a 'sunset' period for investigations, subject to conditions. This is also something that can be looked into. The government will have to create a system where bankers can lend to industry without the sword of an extra regulatory layer in the form of investigating agencies questioning their motives hangs over their necks.

Since the government has declared its intension of remaining in the financial sector and since PSBs will continue to remain the backbone of financing to industry, the earlier this issue is resolved the better for the economy. Otherwise, we will continue to have situations where despite being flush with funds, banks will not lend by simply saying that quality projects are not coming up. That is just a cover as they cannot openly say that they are afraid their decisions will be questioned later.