oppn parties All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

News Snippets

  • 76-year-old retired doctor dies in Hyderabad after being held to digital 'arrest'
  • Paksitan admits that India had rejected thrid-party role in ending the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack
  • Supreme Court seeks reply from the states about anti-conversion laws
  • Calcutta HC rules that a man cannot deny maintaenance to his wife just because she is earning
  • Stocks rebound on Tuesday: Sensex gains 594 points to 82380 and Nifty gains 169 points to 25239
  • China Masters badminton: PV Sindhu reaches second round but Ayush Shetty knocked out
  • World Wrestling Championships: Male wresters draw a blank and wone continue to struggle, showing that India is losing out in a sport where it once excelled
  • Speed Skating World Championships: Anandkumar Velkumar becomes the first Indian to win gold in 100m inline sprint. This comes after his bronze in the 500m event
  • BCCI ropes in Apollo Tyres as new jersey sponsor after Dream 11 had to bow out due to the ban on online gaming companies, to get Rs 200cr more
  • World Athletics: High jumper Sarvesh Anil Kushare finishes an impressive sixth
  • A study has found that the Red Fort in Delhi is turning black due to air pollution
  • PM Modi asks defence ministry to achieve greater integration among armed forces
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay the entire Waqf Act but stays some provisions it finds bad in law
  • Supreme Court closes Vantara zoo case in Jamnagar after the SIT clears the body tasked with maintaining it. Says it will entertain no further complaints in the matter
  • Supreme Court says bringing political parties under POSH Act will liekly become a tool for blackmail
Sebi dismisses Hindenberg's claim against Adani group companies ////// Neeraj Chopra finishes 8th at World Athletics
oppn parties
All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2022-01-11 05:19:53

The decision of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to amend rules to minimize CBI intervention in alleged bank fraud cases is welcome. Specifically, the CVC has said that an expert panel will recommend whether a CBI inquiry is required in bad loans above Rs 3cr (previously Rs 50cr).

Any transaction where money is lent by a bank to a customer is always open to charges of corruption and kickbacks. In many high profile cases this has actually happened. But most loan transactions are through informed decisions by bankers who look at the customer profile, credit ranking, worth of project submitted, past record of loans to similar projects, future prospects of the project and, of course, government policy, among other things, to grant the loan. It is a many layered process and involves various departments of the bank.

Thus, when a loan goes bad, it is not correct to approach the issue as something that involves corruption. There are a host of factors that can turn a loan bad. But such is the buzz around bad loans now that bank officials are easy target. This is taking a huge toll on the economy as banks turn risk averse despite being flush with funds.

The government must reduce the trust deficit and the CVC decision is a good step in that direction. Bankers have also asked it to have a 'sunset' period for investigations, subject to conditions. This is also something that can be looked into. The government will have to create a system where bankers can lend to industry without the sword of an extra regulatory layer in the form of investigating agencies questioning their motives hangs over their necks.

Since the government has declared its intension of remaining in the financial sector and since PSBs will continue to remain the backbone of financing to industry, the earlier this issue is resolved the better for the economy. Otherwise, we will continue to have situations where despite being flush with funds, banks will not lend by simply saying that quality projects are not coming up. That is just a cover as they cannot openly say that they are afraid their decisions will be questioned later.